Photograph of the first General Assembly of Occupy Melbourne, October 15 2011. A large gathering of people in City Square with signs.
The first General Assembly of Occupy Melbourne, October 15 2011.

Occupy Reflects: A Collection of Reflections on Occupy Melbourne

Introduction

A collection of reflections on Occupy Melbourne. The global Occupy movement was one of the most important political events of recent history. Beginning with Occupy Wall Street in New York, the movement triggered an unprecedented wave of uprisings.

Melbourne became the largest occupation in the southern hemisphere.

Editor’s Introduction

The global Occupy movement was one of the most important political events of 2011. Beginning with Occupy Wall Street in New York on 17 September 2011, the movement triggered an unprecedented wave of uprisings in 951 cities in over 82 countries across the world. Melbourne, of course, was not immune from this upswell of resistance. Occupy Melbourne became the largest occupation in Australia, and indeed, the southern hemisphere.

Like most truly novel historical events, the Occupy movement caught most people off guard. Politicians, the media and even hardened activists on the left initially dismissed the movement as an ephemeral and  passing moment, a wave of energetic enthusiasm which would be as fleeting as it was exuberant. But Occupy persisted.

As days turned into weeks and Occupy Melbourne remained a force to be reckoned with, people began to take notice of what was fast turning into a new social movement.

And yet today, looking back, Occupy Melbourne sits awkwardly between the two categories, moment and movement, desperately attempting to escape the tagline of a “has been,” but with not quite enough energy and support to keep going.

On 15 October 2012 we celebrate the anniversary of Occupy Melbourne and this collection of short essays has been published to commemorate the day. This journal grew out of an event planned and facilitated by community organisers, also entitled “Occupy Melbourne Reflects,” which proved to be an incredibly fruitful and valuable experience. There was something remarkable yet uncanny about seeing the same activists but in a different (indoor) space, the same smiles, but no police, the same banter, but without the threat of violence; it was as if we finally had a chance to think.

This journal, then, is a product of the success of that day, sparked by the insight that social movements need a space to reflect on what has happened. Reflection and critique are not just optional extras, but are essential parts of campaigning for social change.

The Occupy Reflects Journal is a chance for a community of activists to pause, take stock of the events of the past year, and reflect on their experiences.

It is a chance to look back on events with fresh eyes, but also to create a collective memory as part of this process of reflection. This series of thoughts, we should not forget, may yet prove useful for future campaigns and struggles. If there is anything that constitutes a theme that unites the contributions in this journal, it is the observation that the Occupy movement was, for those involved, an intense, and sometimes traumatic experience.

The texts themselves each perform certain aspects of the Occupy movement. One can feel the energy and  excitement  bursting from some, while others linger on the page, oozing bitterness and a sense of lost opportunities. One thing is certain: they are raw.

Some of them were hastily scribbled in the heat of political struggle, others were written with time to reflect, but all of them bear witness to the difficulties of politics and the fragility of collective social life.

With all of this talk of trauma and anguish, it should come as no surprise that the current experience of Occupy Melbourne is well captured by the psychoanalytic categories of mourning and melancholia. In many respects, the past few months have been a historical mourning for the failed birth of a new horizon of emancipation. Never have there been hopes that were so high yet so quickly and efficiently dashed. The process of mourning, as Freud described it, is the experience of integrating the realisation of a lost object into the psyche and moving on to something else. In this regard, many of those involved in Occupy describe their current experience as “post-Occupy” and actively participate in a number of affinity groups and campaigns that grew out of the Occupy movement.

On the other hand, Occupy Melbourne continues a phantom, ghost-like existence in the hearts of some remaining participants. Melancholia describes the inability to get over the loss of an object. When an object is shattered and there is no withdrawing of energies or turn to a new object, there is an empty identification of the self with the lost object, creating a traumatic cycle of melancholia. Occupy Melbourne suffered a traumatic death on the day of its eviction from City Square, but, like Hamlet’s father, it lived on in an afterlife, sensing that it had unfinished business with the corporate and political elite. Moving from place to place, it then had to undergo a second, much more drawn out and painful death, as its spiritual and physical resources were gradually drained from it. Now, twice dead but still not yet departed, Occupy Melbourne floats in the phantom nether-region of online debates and in the minds of its believers.

The legacy of Occupy, to be sure, is still a contested and uncertain one. If we agree with Mao that “it’s too early to tell” the full effects of the French Revolution, then certainly we must resist the urge to summarily judge an event that has occurred as recently as the Occupy movement.

More to the point, the Occupy project remains an essentially open one. We still do not know what potential future events might awaken the beast from its slumber and rejuvenate the tired and dispirited activists. “To the tents!” will be the battle cry, as old allies become reacquainted with one another and new tactics and strategies are developed. With a financial crisis looming over Europe and the pending exhaustion of Australia’s mining boom, another global wave of uprisings may be closer than one thinks, for in these crises we must hear the distant roar of battle.

Contents

Editor’s Introduction 3

NOTES FROM THE OCCUPATION

  • The Eviction of One Space, The Start of Another Nicola Paris 7
  • Consensus Decision-Making Tal Slome 9
  • Where to Now for Occupy Melbourne? Cobina Crawford 11
  • Occupy as a Work of Art Carl Scrase 13
  • The Anarchist Roots of the Occupy Movement James Muldoon 15

GENDER

  • For the Women of Occupy Helen Cox 18
  • Power and Privilege at Occupy Melbourne Elizabeth Muldoon 20

PERSONAL REFLECTIONS

  • Post-Occupy Kate Phillips 23
  • The First Aid and Care Team: The Secret Origin of an Affinity Group Jason Coggins 25
  • What Occupy Means to Me: Fledgling Steps Joel Kershaw 27
  • Three Lessons from Occupy James Muldoon 29

THE AFTERMATH

  • It’s Easy to Light a Flame, Harder to Keep it Burning Holly Hammond 33
  • Lost Opportunities: Political Alliances and Democratic Politics Dawn Wells 36
  • General Assemblies: An Overview The Baron 38
  • Promise and Resistance Nicola Paris 41
  • Occupying the Law J.D. 43
  • A Socio-Political Analysis of Occupy Melbourne James Muldoon 46
  • What is Possible Now? Nick Carson 50

Amongst the positive outcomes that I believe the movement achieved was the fact that OCCUPY REFLECTS JOURNAL 28 it gathered like-minded people together, who were able to challenge the system and raise awareness in the broader community. It aimed to show that the system, far from being a fair and democratic one, had fundamentally failed in its duty to the people and that when challenged, it showed that it would resort to various forms of state sanctioned violence (both overtly and covertly), essentially unveiling itself as a fascist security state. This has been an important outcome. – Joel Kershaw

It is only through actual public discussions and demonstrations that we reinvent what it is to be a democratic citizen in a shared world. – James Muldoon

What we have witnessed over the past year is lost opportunities for political alliances. The fault I suspect lies as much with the Occupy movement as it does with other interest groups. But acknowledging this problem, and continuing to interrogate the nature of these potential alliances, will assist future social movements to enact the kind of changes that the Occupy movement called for. – Dawn Wells

Great stuff came out of Occupy Melbourne. When we got together and reflected on the successes and failures, there was an enormous list. For me it showed what was possible, and displayed a promise for the future. – Nicola Paris

Access Resource

Journal cover - Title reads 'Occupy Reflects, Melbourne October 2012'. A charcoal drawing of a tree.

Occupy Reflects (PDF)

Explore Further